1. “Consequentialism and the Deep Doing-Allowing Distinction,” in Consequentialism: New directions, new problems? Christian Seidel. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), forthcoming 2015.
  2. Whose Problem is Non-Identity?” co-authored with Rivka Weinberg, The Journal of Moral Philosophy, online publication April, 2014.
  3. Comments on Douglas Portmore’s Commonsense Consequentialism,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. LXXXVIII No. 1, January (2014), pp. 225-232.
  4. Consequentializing and Deontologizing: Clogging the Consequentialist Vacuum,” Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics Vol. 3, Mark Timmons ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 123-153.
  5. Deontology,” International Encyclopedia of Ethics, (Wiley-Blackwell, February, 2013).
  6. Paradox of DeontologyInternational Encyclopedia of Ethics, (Wiley-Blackwell, February, 2013).
  7. Desire, Judgment, and Reason: Exploring the Path Not Taken,” The Journal of Ethics, Volume 11, Number 4 December (2007), pp. 437-463.
  8. Does Consequentialism Make Too Many Demands, or None at All?Ehics, Volume 116, Number 4, July (2006), pp. 680-706.
  9. Fairness and Beneficence,” Ethics, Volume 113, No. 4, July (2003), pp. 841-864.
  10. A Davidsonian Reconciliation of Internalism, Objectivity, and the Belief-desire Theory,” The Journal of Ethics, Vol. 6, No. 1 (2002), pp. 1-20.
  11. A Kantian Rationale for Desire-based Justification,” Philosophers’ Imprint, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2001), pp. 1-16. http://www.philosophersimprint.org/
  12. Sellars’s Ethics: Variations on Kantian Themes,” Philosophical Studies, Vol. 101 (2000), pp. 291-324.
  13. Agent-centered Restrictions: Clearing the Air of Paradox,” Ethics, Vol. 107, October (1997), pp. 120-146.
  14. Getting Our Options Clear: A Closer Look at Agent-centered Options,” Philosophical Studies, Vol. 78 (1995), pp. 163-188.
  15. Scheffler’s Argument For Deontology,” The Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 74, June (1993), pp. 118-134.
  16. The Hidden Consequentialist Assumption,” Analysis, Vol. 52, October (1992), pp. 241-248.
  17. How Weakness of the Will is Possible,” Mind, Vol. 101, No. 401, January (1992), pp. 85-88.
  18. The Many Appetites of Thomas Hobbes,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, Vol. 7 (1990), pp. 391-407.
  19. Where the Traditional Accounts of Practical Reason Go WrongLogos, Vol. 10 (1989), pp. 157-166.
  20. Dewey on Desires: The Lost Argument,” Transactions of the Peirce Society, Vol. 24 (1988), pp. 509-519. Reprinted in John Dewey: Critical Assessments, J. E. Tiles (ed.) (Routledge, 1992), pp. 91-99.
Advertisements